User talk:Matttest

From 伪基文库
Jump to navigation Jump to search

你好,我需要偽基百科的 “共慘主義” 條目 請幫我備份到偽基文庫. 另外請早日讓主站恢復. --Human110留言) 2022年9月3日 (六) 11:01 (UTC)

give me back my authority--黑底屍留言) 2022年2月14日 (一) 07:05 (UTC)

你到底想要我怎麼做,請直接明言!!!!--黑底屍留言) 2022年3月1日 (二) 17:18 (UTC)

我是國際偽基兄弟計畫的中文區負責人,你不是,請你搞清楚你必須保持中立與協助的身份,我沒經常在這個網站編輯,我有我的編輯行程,並不是我要拋棄這個網站。--黑底屍留言) 2022年3月3日 (四) 10:48 (UTC)

技術上無法協助就算了,麻煩你不要再繼續破壞這個網站,謝謝。--黑底屍留言) 2022年3月26日 (六) 10:09 (UTC)

Consensus, please?[edit]

Hi Matttest,

I'm Doug, a Miraheze Steward. Stewards have received a report of your operating this wiki without or against community consensus. I've reviewed the report, and what it not clear to me is where you held a community discussion, on-wiki, to support this ManageWiki change allowing bureaucrats to remove other bureaucrats? Please note that, as per the default permissions, only Stewards can remove other bureaucrats. In order to change this, it would need overwhelming community consensus, whether in terms of a super-majority on high participation or near unanimity on lower participation. Please note this is a time-sensitive matter, and if satisfactory justification is not provided within twenty-four (24) hours, I will likely revert all changes made since that change.

Dmehus留言) 2022年4月17日 (日) 07:52 (UTC)

I will held a local election for that ManageWiki action. In the mean time, you might simply revert that change before there is community consensus. And for something aftermath, there is clear community consensus for removing the right of a former admin and b’crat who probably accused me of that, see here, with 3 users supported to remove the right of that former b’crat. See here for all evidences and reasons of the voting. So simply revert that ManageWiki change, but don’t regain him admin rights. —Matttest (talk) 03:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Matttest, thank you for your reply on my user talk page, which I've procedurally moved back here to avoid fragmentation of the discussion not only across pages but across multiple wikis as well. Unfortunately, while the ManageWiki log actions can and, indeed, must be reverted, given the complaint from the subject user, your removal of their bureaucrat and sysop from the complainant, as well as another bureaucrat where I have seen no community discussion at all, cannot stand. The reason is because this wiki operated under the recommended default permissions, which call for only Stewards to be the permissioned users capable of removing other bureaucrats. As such, the community discussion would need to be assessed by Stewards. Given what has transpired, this discussion is materially tainted in such a way that neither it, nor your planned discussion to retroactively enable bureaucrats to remove other bureaucrats. Dmehus留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 13:29 (UTC)

Discussion moved from my Meta Wiki user talk page[edit]

I am waiting forward for your reply. —Matttest (talk) 04:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I aim to get this finished tonight. Dmehus (talk) 04:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
@DmehusRaidarr: Hello, I hope you can spend time to check your user talk page at mh:unbooks. I have done the action you required. Raidarr have also gave a notice of attention to this situation on your talk page. From my position, I would like Stewards to remove the sysop right for User:黑底屍 due to personal attack, adding copyright restricted content, removing other users move/edit without appropriate reason plus ignoring their messages, uploading files with names like “file:ndjehcjhjdheucnje.jpg”, disrespecting community consensus, blocking users just because they argue with him/her, etc. These evidences is placed on here. After I had discovered these actions, I tried to communicate with him but he is not answering my concern, replying me with words like “I don’t want to pay attention to this falderal” and saying me “invade his personal website” which is obviously not true as the website is community-based, instead of personal based. With consideration that the communication is ineffective, I had opened a page for the community to vote whether his rights should be removed here, plus I have given him time to debate against my accuses. After his reply and my answer to it, 3 users including me supported his rights to be removed with 0 opposes - which is calculated as 100% support rate. Therefore I removed the rights from him based on community procedures. After this incident, he submitted a foolish complaint asking miraheze to act against community consensus and regain him rights, without an appropriate reason. I would certainly need clear reasons if Steward choose to continue his rights, which is kind of breaking local community decisions. —Matttest (talk) 10:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
I just want to ask two simple questions.
In the recall vote initiated by Matttest, the users who voted are not users who have edited and contributed records in unbooks. Does such a recall vote count as community consensus? Moreover, those users who voted did not have any editing records in unbooks later, they were all the voting troops that Matttest found from other websites. Is such a vote legal?
In addition, there is another user Usename in unbooks including me. We are all users who have edited records in unbooks for many times. Our consensus is to remove Matttest's administrator rights. Our edit records in unbooks can be queried. of. May I ask if we ask to remove Matttest, is it a community consensus of unbooks?
Please Dmehus answer to clear my doubts.--黑底屍 (talk) 01:49, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
@黑底屍: The vote is legal, all voters are from unbooks’ sisterproject mh:uncyclopedia, which is a miraheze wiki. Even though you don’t count on these votes, only me can remove your right by 100% support, with no opposes as you have been blocked for various reasons above. As for Usemane, did he voted oppose in your deadminship vote? No and the fact is that I have notice him about the vote in unbooks. Please don’t help Usemane to vote, the vote should be placed by himself. And again, Users being blocked can not vote, which is a common sense, so you are not a legal voter. —Matttest (talk) 03:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Where is it legal?
unbooks and uncyclopedia are two independent websites, and it is you who illegally changed the settings of Mediawiki, which caused the bureaucrats to remove the bureaucratic authority, which is not allowed according to the original settings.
You have found a user of uncyclopedia to go to unbooks to vote for me to be dismissed. Have my bureaucratic and administrator rights in uncyclopedia been lifted? So are you kidding?
For miraheze, unbooks and uncyclopedia are two independent websites, whether there is a relationship between the two websites, you are not the original creator, you are not qualified to define.
I am the original creator of these two sites, not you.
The voting troop you recruited did not go to the unbooks activities again, and no one responded to your call to go to the unbooks to do the reconstruction activities. How do you explain this situation?--黑底屍 (talk) 03:51, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
@黑底屍: I have said, if you think that only active users in unbooks can vote, the vote is still 100% support rate. As only you, me, and Usemane are active users, I can remove the right of you with 100% support, and Usemane doesn’t oppose too in the vote. So don’t argue with me about the removal of your right. The vote, even I don’t count those users from uncyclopedia, is legal. I am here to admit it is my fault that removed the MediaWiki change, and I had reverted that already. I would also want to note you that normal users should have the same rights and administrators, and even if you the creator, both you and me are ‘crats of the website, so I am qualified to define.—Matttest (talk) 04:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
P.S. You haven’t appeal for the block with an appropriate reason, so the block is likely not to be removed. —Matttest (talk) 04:05, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Unless are not gonna let me open a deadminship vote in uncyclopedia and remove the rights by yourself, don’t talk to me about this issue anymore. This whole thing is explained. —Matttest (talk) 04:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Because you set uncyclopedia as private, no one even noticed that there is a reconstruction activity there. Will you let me to tell them all that there is a reconstruction activity there in their uncyclopedia talk page? If no then don’t talk to me about this. —Matttest (talk) 04:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Steward Comment: I will be commenting here tomorrow and opening mediation to arrive at a continuing solution for all parties. Dmehus留言) 2022年4月24日 (日) 04:25 (UTC)


不好意思请问一下为什么在伪基百科一点进去其中一个条目就会显示「权限错误」呢? Guest278留言) 2022年4月22日 (五) 06:52 (UTC)

说的对,我也是点进去后就突然发现都是权限错误113.211.166.224 2022年5月8日 (日) 05:52 (UTC)


我注意到原伪基百科的一些页面具有娱乐向投票的功能(例如脑残),如何用代码构建出这种投票?——梅友仁留言) 2022年4月24日 (日) 18:42 (UTC)


至於你要另外創設其他品牌的惡搞百科網站,那是你的自由,我無權阻攔干涉,偽基百科的品牌知名度也不是一朝一夕就爆紅的,也是歷經了十餘年的建設經營,不是你這個想揀現成而不曉得努力的傢伙所能輕易竊占的。--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 01:08 (UTC)



自己考慮,不要敬酒不吃,一堆人因為你影響了他們玩偽基的權益--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 01:33 (UTC)


你想取代我接管偽基百科,抱歉,辦不到,因為你的能力及品德都不夠資格。--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 01:45 (UTC)

偽基百科會做權限限縮,那是系統原本就賦予管理員可合法更改的權限,我不像你惡意竄改Mediawiki的設置,讓原本不能撤除的行政員權限改成可以撤除。 我有權對偽基百科進行保護性的戒嚴措施,原因就因為你。
但我中文偽基百科的五個站是不可能轉讓給你,用戶只投票罷免,可沒投票讓你接任。--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 01:55 (UTC)




到頭來中文偽基的老大還是輪不到你來當。況且我說了,人家只是罷免我,可沒投票選舉你來替代我,你是不是夢該醒了?--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 05:51 (UTC)



現在是你我在對話,不是在答辯,我沒興趣跟一個不正常講話的繼續浪費時間。--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 06:18 (UTC)

Steward update[edit]

Though Matttest's adoption request was valid, it's clear that with the three active contributors to this wiki being unable to work together without removing rights or blocking each other, though admittedly the other two users were not that active until Matttest's adoption request, having discussed this with Agent Isai, it's clear to me that until this is resolved, the best course of action is to have this wiki placed under a Steward conservatorship, with requests for ManageWiki changes effected by Stewards, when there is agreement among all parties for the changed. I'll discuss my plan with Raidarr further, but in the mean time, this is the best near-term solution until I can take a take closer examination of this. Thanks.

In the mean time, if all three parties can please provide statements here, in new threads, in English if possible, listing their grievances and identifying whether they feel they can work with each other, that would be great. Dmehus留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 13:34 (UTC)

I don't need your help[edit]

Do you really understand what unbooks is about before you propose adoption?
Obviously from your previous actions you just want to use this site as a springboard to take over uncyclopedia further and replace me as the new boss.
But unfortunately, the brand uncyclopedia has gained its popularity and scale today after more than ten years of operation and development.
I require that as an administrator, I must understand the topic better than the user, and be able to contribute wonderful works. If I understand and have more ability than the user, I am qualified to be a website editor to improve or eliminate the articles contributed by the user. , but I am sorry that you do not have this ability, and your character is very flawed.

I suggest that you can apply to create your own wiki and run it by yourself, instead of enjoying the ready-made achievements that others have cultivated. But you don't have the will and the courage to challenge yourself.
I can only say sorry for miraheze's ruling.
My only request to you is to do your best to be invisible on this wiki, don't do anything, this wiki doesn't need you anywhere. thanks.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月25日 (一) 18:28 (UTC)

I would like you to not define everything by yourself. What you said, 'I require that as an administrator, I must understand the topic better than the user, and be able to contribute wonderful works.' is what yout think, instead of the general use of sysop tools. Why sysop rights is granted? It's because a wiki needs sysop to do actions like protect, block and delete which should be protecting the wiki from being vandalised. Sysop are just a group of volunteers who would like to help out the wiki in the technical side based on community consesus. They don't have responsibility to submit 'wonderful pages' (which again is vague and defined by you). What you said at first is already defined by you (admins need to submit wonderful things), so the corresponding result (I shouldn't be sysop) must be what you want. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月26日 (二) 05:47 (UTC)
What you said is substituting wiki to be you. 'This wiki doesn't need you anywhere' is that you doesn't need me, please stop using these logical fallicies to make stewards think what you said is 'logical'/ --Matttest留言) 2022年4月26日 (二) 05:54 (UTC)

I refuse because I can't trust you.
And you don't have the tech support I need, you just stay here and don't go anywhere.
That's what helped me the most.
Thank you.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月26日 (二) 06:09 (UTC)

黑底屍, I have received your e-mail complaint to Stewards, and the reason I have not replied to you personally yet as I'm personally involved in this as I believe your complaint had validity. That being said, the reason your wiki was eligible for adoption is because you and the other administrator were not active. Matttest is active. He should not have removed you and the other administrator, as that is for Stewards to do, and only when there is overwhelming and/or clear consensus from existing contributors to this wiki. I'm hoping we can move forward in a way that is amenable to all. Dmehus留言) 2022年4月27日 (三) 06:16 (UTC)

Trying to get consensus[edit]

Ping 黑底屍 and Usemane here. I would like to accommodate a little bit to let this be an effective communication, instead of keep arguing. Some of the terms that I want to get consensus is stated clearly below:

  • I withdrawn the request of your desysop vote, in exchange you withdrawn the request too;
  • Both 3 of us can request and get back 'crat rights from steward if we both agree with other terms stated below;
  • I will stop the reconstruction activity;
  • you reopen uncyclopedia and other related projects and unblock me there;
  • if there is a need of MediaWiki changes, 'crats need to obtain stewards agree first;
  • Any desysop and de'crat actions must be done by stewards, with evidences of abusing the tools plus clear community consesus;
  • The accuses stated here in the desysop vote cannot be once again use in future reasons of removal of rights.

See if you agree in the above terms and do you want to amend some of the terms/add new terms. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月27日 (三) 01:14 (UTC)

The only consensus between me and Usemane is that Matttest relinquishes the administrator position and leaves unbooks, because we do not have any trust in Matttest, and he has absolutely nothing to help with the construction and operation of unbooks, Matttest is redundant, his adoption It is true that we neglected to take care of the lack of the website, but the procedure is legal, but it is an unreasonable adoption, because he does not have the ability and morality to operate the website after adoption.
This consensus is that there will be no room for changes and discussions.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月27日 (三) 17:43 (UTC)

If Matttest really wants to be a wiki manager, he might as well add a wiki directly and develop it himself.
The Uncyclopedia series is a website brand established in 2006 after nearly 20 years of operation. To join our management team, one must possess both ability and character, but unfortunately Matttest does not have any qualifications.
In order to avoid this dispute making Matttest a loser with nothing, I suggest that Matttest establish a new wiki, create a new brand, and let him work hard to manage it. Through the process of running his own wiki, he will understand what we are today. The real reason for his coexistence cannot be accepted.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月27日 (三) 17:55 (UTC)

Except from my managewiki action which I have followed stewards guideline quickly, what have I done wrong in terms of abusing the admin tools? There must be a clear reason when you ask for removal of adminship. You always say 'I don't have ability' is that what you think, without clear sources. My accuses, which you keep evade, have clear evidences. I have already stated my bottom line above, if you don't agree it, let steward to decide whether your rights should be continued. You wanted to remove my rights without appropriate accuses, and just ask Usemane probably your meatpuppet to request removal of my rights, this is absolutely tyranny of majority. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月28日 (四) 00:44 (UTC)
You just focused too much on submitted 'wonderful works', however, this is not a responsibility of a sysop (I doesn't mean you shouldn't submit these). The responsibility of sysop is to listen other people's opinions, and helping them instead of biting newbies (you ignore new users who asked you why reverting his move to a file), which I am trying to do above but you rejected my bottom line. Sysop is also responsible for protecting pages, blocking users, and deleting pages to protect the community and wiki from vandalism. From your attitude always saying 'I think', isn't qualified to be an admin. Since then, I am trying to develop a local community policy (you have ignored this for a long time while traditional chinese uncyclopedia projects is already doing) which sets a rule that everyone should follow so there will be no arguments. What you think is this threatened your dictatorship to this wiki, what you think is to keep your ruling here, instead of working out a solution for the unbooks community. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月28日 (四) 00:57 (UTC)
Sorry, unbooks is a wiki created by me, so the rules of this site are determined by me, the creator of the site.
This is something that even the housekeeper cannot interfere with to refute.
This website does not need to have firewall personnel, because no other users are active on this website, because the other three websites are in a restricted state, but users do not flow to this website, so there is no need for you, an extra person, to be here.
This site needs writers to fill in interesting content to attract people, like uncyclopedia, but you don't have that ability.
If you feel unhappy, feel free to complain to the butler about my policy on website management, because this policy is supported by Usename, and he has been my good assistant for a long time.
Or you can quit your job and start a new wiki with your philosophy, and I will bless you.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月28日 (四) 01:12 (UTC)
I have said that already, if you want to submit those 'wonderful works' here, I won't intervene your action, but at the same time I am not responsible to submit these wonderful works (which is define by you). What I am trying to do is to help new users to intergrate to this wiki, protecting this wiki from vandalism, and because you and Usemane is completly not active here, I am doing minor edits to save this wiki from deletion. Which sysop do you think new users want? A dictator like you who always say 'I don't trust you' and 'I am the creator', and directly revert any new user's edits you don't want, moving files without any reasons at all, or someone like me who will try to communicate with them? Please answer me in your reply. What you said 'to attract people', yeah of course, so a local community policy to let new users to intergrate here more is essential. I am the one who tries to communicate with you and I have given you with some terms that I want to get consensus, but you refuse to communicate. It is you that keep asking stewards to remove my rights by a tyranny of majority, with no appropriate accuses. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月28日 (四) 02:45 (UTC)
If you want dictatorship, no problem, create your own blog with all those funny articles, then no one will intervene any of your actions. This is a wiki website, and there should be no dictatorship here and 'the wiki creator' should be same like other users in terms on being responsible on your actions and listen to other users opinions. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月28日 (四) 02:48 (UTC)

Haven't you figured out something until today?
You don't really matter, okay?
This website will not be closed without editing activity records in the past, but it will allow miraheze to open up to allow adoption. Besides, the adoption was not an announcement by miraheze at the beginning, but you took the initiative to find miraheze and expressed your hope for adoption, and no one invited you.
Because you are unnecessary, you are not needed, you think you are needed, but in fact what you propose is not what this website needs at all, it is completely your self-righteous cognition.
So what do you think I need to communicate with a redundant person? You are absolutely useless, I just feel sorry that miraheze forced you to give me, and I can't refuse.

I have never been able to understand, since you are not popular, why are you still on this website shamelessly? Your presence is fundamentally the cause of the dispute.
When it comes to public awareness, the consensus among unbooks users is that they want you to leave. Why don't you respect this consensus?
Do you think it makes any sense for you to stay on this site?
I said, you have opinions on the rules and guidelines of the website that I have made, even if you go to the housekeeper to complain to me, I will not stop you.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月28日 (四) 03:21 (UTC)

You haven't answered me yet: Which sysop do you think new users want? A dictator like you who always say 'I don't trust you' and 'I am the creator', and directly revert any new user's edits you don't want, moving files without any reasons at all, or someone like me who will try to communicate with them? What I did is to help new users to join the unbooks community, what you did is to define everything by yourself, saying other people 'useless'. If you think no local community needs to be developed, then why English uncyclopedia, chinese uncyclopedia in traditional chinese, japansese uncyclopedia and all other languages do except you? What you did is to keep your dicatorship to this wiki, I am trying to get things good by writing the above terms, but you keep refusing to communicate. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月28日 (四) 04:08 (UTC)

Don't say that I have been denying you without valid reasons.
I'll give you a homework, please find out which page of this website needs to be revised and edited?
How do you modify it after you find it out?
Just one page.
When you find it, come and discuss it with me.
If you don't find it, it proves that you are useless and redundant.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月28日 (四) 08:58 (UTC)

Have you read what I said? Sysop is not responsible to submit and edit with 'wonderful works'. Sysop is responsible for protecting the wiki from vandalism (you are disqualified as you are very inactive here for a long time), solving disputes (again disqualified as you just personal attack other users as 'useless', instead of focusing to solve the issue), and help and encourage new users to join this wiki (disqualified as you didn't try to communicate with them and revert their edits). You are just defining everything by yourself so that you can keep your dictatorship here. If you want me to create a new brand by myself, I don't understand why don't create your own blog that no one can edit with all the funny articles then? I will not and not able to intervene that. I have no problem working with you, it is you that refuse to work with me so you should create your own brand instead of me. This is a wiki website, so you should respect other users, it is not a place for dictatorship/tyranny of majority. To quickly solve the dispute here now, a local community policy must be developed to avoid disputes again here, which is the above terms I have written. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月29日 (五) 01:38 (UTC)
What you do are making issues bad - assigning me with a foolish homework to push all responsibility. What I do is to try getting consensus quickly for now. Also please unblock me in uncyclopedia and undictionary at first, I have no edits there - if you continue the block you are blocking me just because I am arguing with you. --Matttest留言) 2022年4月29日 (五) 01:42 (UTC)

Having said all that, the only thing you can do is be a watchdog.
Even if uncyclopedia is restricted, users don't stream here, and no one browses. Do you think it's necessary for you to continue to exist here?

This website was not created by you, the articles were not edited by you, and you express as if you are the owner of this website, how can there be such a brazen person?
It's because of you that uncyclopedia restricts browsing. If uncyclopedia is permanently closed because of this, I don't care.
I can tell you very clearly, uncyclopedia, don't think about it in your life, I can't make any concessions.

I can argue with you on this site every day and keep it active until you feel bored and leave, but I won't contribute new articles. For the other four sites, I will upload new works, but you are not welcome forever.
Feel free to sue me if you have an opinion.
Thank you.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月29日 (五) 10:28 (UTC)

Take a look at uncyclopedia. Even with restricted browsing, new accounts are being registered every day.
new accounts are being registered every day.
But any of these newly registered users to unbooks?
I don't think there should be.
These users who enthusiastically support uncyclopedia are losing their rights and interests because you refuse to leave. If you want to initiate a vote, will you leave and the website will return to normal? Or dismiss me to unblock it. I believe that most users would rather let you leave after learning the truth.
Because the control and dominance of the website is mine, not you.
In 2019, at fandom, all languages of uncyclopedia in the world will be closed. At that time, I persuaded uncyclopedia in various countries to migrate quickly, because I was the first to migrate, and I first registered domain name. So if I didn't migrate, uncyclopedia would have disappeared from the online world as early as 2019.
It's you who didn't understand the situation.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月29日 (五) 10:52 (UTC)
You finally admitted you are controlling this website by dictatorship. What you have said “I believe that most users would rather let you leave after learning the truth.”, when I just looked at this sentence I just laugh out loud, how can you make this claim without a reason? The whole truth is that you don’t respect new users and removing their edits without a reason at all, while I try my best to get community consensus with you and resolve disputes to make unbooks better. Will new users after their edits being removed or their pages being deleted without a reason by you, still support you? Will users support a dictator who ignore others and decide/define everything of a project by himself? Absolutely not. Feel free to tell me how “your truth” makes users to stay on your side. Also, it is you revoked user’s rights to view uncyclopedia, not me. Of course you can say the website is closed because of me, but when the users in uncyclopedia know that it is you locked a website just because someone is arguing with you, how will they think? Will they still think it’s my problem or it is you locking the website without reason? I have not said that uncyclopedia is less popular than unbooks, because unbooks is only a sisterproject of uncyclopedia. However, it is not a reason at all that I should remove my rights when a website is not popular. Instead, I should keep my rights here to keep unbooks active. You have said you will continue to upload new works to other projects, that’s another shameless lie. Except from unnews and uncyclopedia, you have no things done on other projects except importing the pages from fandom. If you really does edit there, why unbooks, undictionary and unmusic have a history of being closed as inactive before? You are less than a watchdog here, how can you not noticed that when miraheze have closed it from editing because of the meta:Dormancy Policy? I although didn’t submit those “wonderful works”, I am active here to help new users and prevents vandalism. —Matttest留言) 2022年4月30日 (六) 03:47 (UTC)
P.S. Please unblock me on undictionary, unmusic and other related projects, there is no reason to block me there as I have no edits there at all. Given that you choose the continue the block, you are blocking me there just because I am having conflicts with you. —Matttest留言) 2022年4月30日 (六) 03:47 (UTC)

Where are new users in unbooks?
I only see that you are arguing with me every day, and new users are registered every day at uncyclopedia. And not every new user breaks someone else's site like you do.
You're never welcome at Uncyclopedia, don't you understand?

You want to be a watchdog, you really came to the wrong place.
You don't think about how to absorb pageviews, you just move a chair and sit at the door to see which new user will destroy it.

Unbooks is just a small website with no editorial traffic and no new user registration, so do you think you still need to exist? ?

In fact, you should go to Wikipedia to apply for an administrator, there is room for your expertise.
Unbooks is just a small temple, and it can't afford a great bodhisattva like you.

I forgot that undictionary and unmusic are also blocked to restrict browsing, so you can't see what my Usename is doing for a while. It doesn't matter, you can try to adopt undictionary and unmusic to see if you can adopt them, so that you will know if there is any editing activity on those two websites recently, it's okay to try.

For a while now, the two websites have been reorganizing the categories and redesigning the templates simultaneously. We not only edit articles, but also design.
It's a job that you arrogant bastard can't do.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月30日 (六) 05:37 (UTC)

I have said your logic have no sense at all: because this site is not popular, I should remove my rights. Can I know why is this related? I agree that this site is not popular, but that’s why I need to exist to make it popular and active. You are not active for a long time here that’s why the wiki is closed, you are less than a watchdog here. In addition, new users don’t want a sysop that will revert their edits without a reason and don’t try to communicate with them. Unless you have a clear reason that I abused my sysop tools, my rights should be continued. At this point, just unblock me in undictionary and other related projects, and wait for steward mediation. —Matttest留言) 2022年4月30日 (六) 09:31 (UTC)
And what you have said to adopt them - it is impossible as you set the wiki as private. You didn’t even read miraheze’s policy before migrating here, while I am clear with these. —Matttest留言) 2022年4月30日 (六) 09:33 (UTC)
And what you say I am not welcomed, another laugh out loud sentence. There is only you that think I am not welcomed, while other users in uncyclopedia welcomes me - just look at the vote that you say illegal. If I can open a admin removal in uncyclopedia, it will at least be 80% support rate. —Matttest留言) 2022年4月30日 (六) 09:39 (UTC)
Important notice to Stewards and 黑底屍: The block against me should be removed in uncyclopedia and other related projects, as there is no reason to block me there. The only reason is not a reason at all - I am arguing with you.

Sorry, uncyclopedia is an active site, and the steward has no right to intervene in the management there, as you said.
Users just don't like me, it doesn't mean they like you, so they said they wanted to dismiss me, but they didn't say they wanted you to take over because there is still a Usename there, he's a bureaucrat there, and he clearly hates you.
As you keep repeating, preventing new users from sabotage, yes, permanently banning you is precisely preventing new users from sabotage, because of your sabotage on unbooks, launching a coup, I have to prevent you on a website that I can fully grasp, This is in line with your consistent assertion that your past behavior record fully qualifies for a permanent ban.
Thank you.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月30日 (六) 11:02 (UTC)

I forgot to tell you that undictionary and unmusic have been released from privatization and can be viewed publicly.
You can try to adopt them, but unfortunately you won't make it, because the two sites are not unedited in 60 days.
As for when uncyclopedia resumes public viewing, the decision rests with you, not me.
When you resign yourself and leave is when uncyclopedia resumes public viewing.
Of course, you can ask the housekeeper to cry and pressure me to unban you.
It's just that you can't be an administrator of uncyclopedia, because I'm the administrator of that site, and you can't cut the queue to become an administrator by adoption.
Yes, I'm a dictator and I totally ignore the intentions of a few users, bite me.--黑底屍留言) 2022年4月30日 (六) 12:02 (UTC)

I have no related accounts at Wikipedia, I don’t care if you appeal that to stewards. Also, if you delete the reasons of your abuse of admin of the page, I will appeal this to stewards. —Matttest留言) 2022年5月2日 (一) 12:33 (UTC)
And I don’t care how you did at uncyclopedia anymore, what I care is to help this wiki, not you. I am now granting rights to those who have contributed to this wiki now. —Matttest留言) 2022年5月2日 (一) 12:38 (UTC)

what can you give? You are no longer a bureaucrat, and I am still a bureaucrat at the other four stations.
Besides, the evidence collection you are doing is not the behavior on this website, I don't understand what you are doing?

The original author of the articles on this website is me. You have no contribution to the work at all. I don’t know where you are so arrogant?
You oppose the Communist Party, and in my opinion, your thinking and behavior are no different from the Communist Party.

At present, the supervisor is still observing the performance of your adoption website. It doesn’t matter if I don’t continue to contribute. Originally, I neglected to take care of this website for two years before letting you join the queue. The point is that you apply for adopting this website. What can you do? Let this website activate and absorb traffic?

Can those users who have been active on this site ever reappear?
Why should they show up again?
I don't think you understand the situation at all.
I'll show up again just to see when you're going to fuck off.

You don't care about the best of uncyclopedia, then you don't need to care about your account being permanently banned, because that's a ban that will never be lifted.--黑底屍留言) 2022年5月2日 (一) 15:12 (UTC)

No amount of evidence you give can change my status as the administrator of the other four sites.
Besides, are there any hard rules on how to use the filename of my uploaded file?
Just take care of unbooks, unnews is not your territory.
Instead of liquidating my incriminating evidence, think about how to activate the site and get users to come in and browse the edits.
You don't have to expect me to help with anything, because it's yours to adopt, it's your business.
I'm just watching when you get fired for incompetence.--黑底屍留言) 2022年5月2日 (一) 15:32 (UTC)

Just, what the hell is going on here? --DarkMatterMan4500留言) 2022年5月12日 (四) 10:17 (UTC)



再一次弱弱的問你,要不要來玩民事活動,如果沒有回應,我改時間再問一次。--黑底屍留言) 2022年5月22日 (日) 20:27 (UTC)


做人謹慎點,別搞些走夜路的行徑。--黑底屍留言) 2022年5月22日 (日) 20:41 (UTC)

你連最基本的電腦知識都没有,用什麼自己作的名词 "免洗IP",這是第一樣。第二樣你這是訴诸法律威脅,違反miraheze行為守則。说到底你还是不甘心失去了伪基文库,所以來玩这些吧。我已投票成功了,Msnhinet8也不幫你了,請停止你的騷擾行為,你再搞下去的話我只能要求Steward把你部份封禁。--Matttest留言) 2022年5月22日 (日) 23:42 (UTC)




這只是通知你的訊息,你可以不用回覆,即使回了我也不會看,就這樣。--黑底屍留言) 2022年5月29日 (日) 03:16 (UTC)

黑底屍,你是中文區負責人又如何?正體中文的偽基人都說你建的漢語偽基只是個人偽基:[1][2],什麼文章刪除你說了算,社群無法投票當選行政員,保護和封鎖政策寫得不明不白,是你完全敗壞了偽基百科的品牌。至於你所謂的伪基教科书,你只要把這抄了一根毫毛,我會在不通知你的情況下投訴,這樣總不會恐嚇了吧。我的拯救偽基行動是要使一般用戶有權監督管理員的行為而不受打壓(這是我一直不退下來的原因,使你的權限使用受制衡),並可按指引當選行政員,以及撰寫政策規管用户及管理員的行為,以重新鼓勵用戶貢獻(先前的用戶被你刪文刪怕了)。-Matttest留言) 2022年5月29日 (日) 03:44 (UTC)


我留一個乾淨的空站給你慢慢玩,包含首頁及logo,麻煩請自行設計,因為那都是偽基文庫版權的東西。--黑底屍留言) 2022年5月30日 (一) 15:56 (UTC)

無論是現實生活還是在網路上。--黑底屍留言) 2022年5月30日 (一) 16:14 (UTC)

這原因根本不可能成立。偽基文庫大半文章都是以前wikia自由鳥及其他新人作的,你寫的少之又少。至於你的文章我只要加一兩筆小編輯,这样你就不是「唯一貢獻者」。至於Usemane根本是你的小弟,要制衡要社群選出的行政員才是真的制衡。 Matttest留言) 2022年5月30日 (一) 23:40 (UTC)






你有本事就去自創你自己的偽基百科,當然前提是你有這個能力的話。--黑底屍留言) 2022年6月7日 (二) 02:11 (UTC)

當然你自行創立的偽基百科,請你自己寫你自己的,希望你不要厚顏無恥到直接抄襲我寫的。謝謝。--黑底屍留言) 2022年6月7日 (二) 02:39 (UTC)
你留著給你自慰做夢用吧。--黑底屍留言) 2022年6月7日 (二) 03:46 (UTC)


  • 嗨,您好,我了解您與黑底屍發生的紛爭,願祝兩位早日解除彼此的衝突,以恢復和平的榮景,我以中立自居,謝謝。--Msnhinet8 (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
好的,謝謝您的幫忙唷。--Msnhinet8 (talk) 06:30, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
我想好後再作完整答覆,謝謝。--Msnhinet8 (talk) 06:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
@Msnhinet8: 「我以中立自居,謝謝。 」,然後你就給他又建一個伪基文库來抄襲miraheze伪基文库的內容且未加來源,作為他的共犯協助他違反版權法(因伪基文库是以CC BY-SA 4.0的版權協定發佈)。好的,多謝你的雙重標準。--Matttest (talk) 05:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
我正準備要求changeip.com那邊下架你創建的侵權網站。-Matttest (talk) 08:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
@Msnhinet8: 你有兩個選擇,一是自行下架,二是我向changeip投訴你違反版權。你創建的翻版伪基文库里的頁面,除了他原來在miraheze寫的頁面,已然違反版權CC BY-SA 3.0 條款。對此我可一次過向changeip告知,再在miraheze伪基文库上的MediaWiki:Sitenotice加一個數位千年版權法(DMCA)下架要求,到時候你會在changeip那邊被迫下架。你自己選擇。-Matttest (talk) 09:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
  • 我之後應該也不會再幫黑底屍了,我先刪除偽基文庫。--Msnhinet8 (talk) 03:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
  • 嗨,請問您可以給我在miraheze一般的管理員權限嗎?--Msnhinet8 (talk) 06:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
@Msnhinet8: 這不符合miraheze的政策規定,請求管理員權限需要先於Meta:Requests for permissions自薦,再經過社群投票通過。-Matttest (talk) 10:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
好的,謝謝。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 11:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
  • 另外,我可能考慮暫時離開miraheze了。--Msnhinet8 (talk) 03:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
我考慮之後退出wikicreator權限。--Msnhinet8 (talk) 03:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
另外,我在離開偽基百科管理員權限之前幫您解封了帳號,謝謝。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 03:45, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
這樣changeip那裡你還要檢舉我嗎? Msnhinet8 (talk) 03:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
這樣行嗎? Msnhinet8 (talk) 03:55, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
另外,偽基文庫刪不掉因為主機商改ip了。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 03:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
@Msnhinet8: 我檢舉沒有意思,我只是希望你不要搞雙重標準。你先把黑底屍的帳號移除管理員權限,使得那裏變成休止wiki便可。 Matttest (talk) 04:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
ok Msnhinet8 (talk) 04:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
不過他沒有給我行政員權限所以我無法動到他的管理員權限,抱歉。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 04:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
@Msnhinet8: 你有行政員權限啊,行政員可以任意更改別人權限的。 Matttest (talk) 04:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
我剛已經照做了,謝謝。就是取消黑底屍的管理員權限。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 04:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
還有你在伪基百科在給我成員權限可以嗎?謝了。我也不會再打擾你了--Matttest (talk) 04:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
另外,我在miraheze中偽基百科只有管理員權限,要用圖給你看嗎? Msnhinet8 (talk) 04:33, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
@Msnhinet8: 我只需要最基本的成員權限,在這裏給我,管理員可以給的。 Matttest (talk) 04:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
我要的是會員啦,謝謝。 Matttest (talk) 04:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
您看圖,謝謝。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 04:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
已給囉。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 04:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
我看了,我要的是會員權限,可以幫助我加嗎? Matttest (talk) 04:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
有看到嗎? Msnhinet8 (talk) 04:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)



懶得理你,你蹦跳得越起勁,你繼續吧,動作越多只會越讓你像隻猴--黑底屍 (talk) 06:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

光是香港是地區我就已笑死,至少我們台灣還有總統有14個邦交國,哈哈哈 Msnhinet8 (talk) 06:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
我們台灣更甚至還有過國王(鄭氏王朝),香港,哈哈。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 06:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
完全是不懂裝懂在瞎唬爛--黑底屍 (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
不管怎樣我要先退出miraheze了 Msnhinet8 (talk) 07:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
您指誰? Msnhinet8 (talk) 13:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
我指那個不懂裝懂法律的黑底屍。建議你保持中立,不要捲入此鬥爭...... Matttest (talk) 14:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
了解。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


你又恐赫我,我真的不忍了,我要幫誰還要你左右我嗎? Msnhinet8 (talk) 08:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

我會截圖然後去問派出所看這樣能不能告,你等著吧。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 08:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
我明天中午就去派出所問。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 08:39, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
我會要你登報道歉的。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 08:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
你就慢慢等等我消息,能不能告由警察定奪。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 08:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
你慢慢熬吧,我從沒這麼生氣過。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 08:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
除非你道歉或取消投訴,不然你慢慢等吧。 Msnhinet8 (talk) 08:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
太好了,你有得等了,明天會下雨 Msnhinet8 (talk) 08:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
你如果能取消投訴,我大可不必去派出所問,我告訴你啦我表哥在基隆當警察,我今晚就可以fb問他能不能告 Msnhinet8 (talk) 09:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
好吧 這件事就這麼算了
我暫時原諒你 Msnhinet8 (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
那就這麼算囉 Msnhinet8 (talk) 10:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


请问您能重把我在伪基百科的帐号获得成员的认可吗?我想赶快编辑关于伪基里的马来西亚政治条目。希望您能帮助我。Guest278留言) 2022年12月13日 (二) 07:50 (UTC)

我问了那位“黑_屍”的管理员,但它没回应我,似乎不想帮助我。我是真的需要赶紧编辑了,请问能吗?Guest278留言) 2022年12月13日 (二) 07:50 (UTC)

@Guest278: 其實你去編輯了也沒用,因為他打算永久把伪基百科變成不讓公眾瀏覽的私人百科,所以你寫的文章不僅不會被其他人看,更是直接把文章擁有權送給那兒的管理員,而那位管理员也可以無原因刪除。建議你可以在這裡寫幾篇偽基條目,暫時只有偽基文庫可以自由創作。-Matttest留言) 2022年12月13日 (二) 10:12 (UTC)
偽基只有他一個和另外一個完全不處理站務的Usemane管理員,所以只要是他不喜歡的內容他便一律回退,你若再創建新的他便直接封鎖你,見伪基文库:管理員解任投票/黑底屍/第二次/證據。-Matttest留言) 2022年12月13日 (二) 10:19 (UTC)

是啊,他之前还把我创作的新闻给删除了,证据在这:[3][4] Guest278留言) 2022年12月14日 (三) 09:53 (UTC)

对了,要怎样能创立一个属于自己的百科?伪基百科不能用了,代码很多还在那。我想,还是试先创立新的吧,好过可以避免杂乱的其他百科网页。 Guest278留言) 2022年12月14日 (三) 09:56 (UTC)



78-Yellowcat留言) 2023年9月17日 (日) 05:55 (UTC)

另外我在其他语言的伪基已有一定的编辑经验,希望管理员能授予我确认用户权限。 78-Yellowcat留言) 2023年9月17日 (日) 06:32 (UTC)
我在其他語言的偽基有不少反破壞經驗,希望管理員能授予我回退員權限。78-Yellowcat留言) 2023年11月4日 (六) 14:32 (UTC)
感謝!78-Yellowcat留言) 2023年11月5日 (日) 08:00 (UTC)


本站已有一段時間沒有行政員了,提名你做行政員如何?78-Yellowcat留言) 2023年11月4日 (六) 14:32 (UTC)

可以喔。相關提名可在Talk:首頁中提出。-Matttest留言) 2023年11月5日 (日) 07:52 (UTC)
好的!78-Yellowcat留言) 2023年11月5日 (日) 08:00 (UTC)